Why wasn’t the Torah given in the Land of Israel? Since the Land was given by
G-dto the Jews to be a holy nation in their own Holy Land, wouldn’t it seem to make more sense for them to receive the holy Torah in such a holy place as Israel or Jerusalem?
This is a challenging question, and there are several possible answers.
It is true that Israel is the Holy Land and that the quality of Torah and mitzvah observance there is considered higher than anywhere else in the world. The Talmud (Bava Batra 158b) states that even the air of the Land of Israel is conducive to spiritual growth.
However, for this reason
Another reason was to indicate that even though the ultimate place for Torah learning and observance is the Land of Israel, nevertheless, it is not dependent on the Jewish People being in the Land; and even in exile they connect to
Additional reasons mentioned in the sources as to why Gd did not give the Torah in Israel but rather in the wilderness: To teach that just as the wilderness is ownerless and freely accessible to all, so too the Torah is free and open to all (Tanchuma); just as the wilderness is materially sparse and simple, so too the Torah is found among people who refrain from luxuries and are humble (Bamidbar Rabba 1); just as the wilderness is traversed by all, so should a Torah scholar be willing to be plied for his wisdom by all (Eruvin 54a).
Another interesting idea is that if the Torah had been given in Israel, the Jewish People might come to think that the teachings of the Torah are just for them, or non-Jews might think that they have no connection to it. So